Monday, 29 August 2011
Magnitude of the Orphans and Vulnerable Children OVC Crisis
The magnitude and severity of the OVC crisis in Nigeria is largely undetermined. It is evident that Nigeria is facing an OVC crisis with more than 7 million orphans due to AIDS and other causes, apart from millions of vulnerable children from several causes. There is a deepening and widening exclusion and invisibility of children in Nigeria. The information available paints a depressing picture of neglect, exploitation and abuse facing a large percentage of children today. It is estimated that 39% of children aged between 5 – 14 years are engaged in child labour; 43% of women aged 20 – 24 were married or in union before they were 18 years old between 1986 and 2004 (SWC, UNICEF 2006). A large proportion (40%) of street children may have been trafficked (ILO-IPEC 2001), estimated 40% do not attend primary school (NPC/ORC 2004) and the rights of most children in Nigeria are being denied.
HIV and AIDS became a national challenge over the past two decades when the first case was identified in a 13 year old street hawker. Since then, about one-quarter of the orphans population in Nigeria are due to HIV and AIDS. The situation of children is further compounded by the worsening vulnerability of children through high maternal mortality, poverty, diseases, armed conflicts, socio-political and ecological problems, and communal clashes leading to family dislocation and instability in family income.
Without taking determined steps to address the specific needs of children, there will be no chance of meeting the MDGs and NEEDS. Each of the MDGs is connected to the well-being of children. Failure to achieve these goals would have devastating consequences for the children of this generation and the adults they will become if they survive their childhood.
ADOLESCENT SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH BACKGROUND IN NIGERIA
Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. Its population is one of its most significant and distinctive features. With an estimated population of 140 million, Nigeria represents about 20% of the total population of sub- Saharan Africa.
The country’s adolescent sexual and reproductive health profile reveals that Nigerian women give birth to an average of nearly 6 children in a life time. With an annual population growth rate of 2.8%, Nigeria’s population is expected to double by 2015 (to nearly 260 million) requiring a doubling of all infrastructures to maintain the present low standard of living. The current modern contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) is just 9.8% with little change. Women and girls are the most vulnerable through unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion, and complications of pregnancy and childbirth (a Nigerian woman’s lifetime chance of dying from pregnancy or childbirth is 1in 13). Low educational attainment further compounds the picture for women and children. Higher education levels often correlate with higher levels of contraceptive use and lower mortality rates, contraceptive use and lower mortality rates among children.
It was estimated that a one year increment in mother’s education leads to a 7-9 % decline in less than five mortality providing incentive for higher contraceptive use. While 78% of Nigeria’s children age 6-12 attend primary school, at least 1.5 million fewer girls than boys enroll in Nigeria’s primary schools. Just 39% of primary 6 school pupils made it to JSS1 in 2002. Adolescent account for a large proportion of the population, up to 23%. By age 19, 70% of all adolescents are sexually active, and most encounters are unprotected. Thus, there is a high rate of teenage pregnancy and a correspondingly high level of unsafe abortion. About 80% of all abortion complications reported in hospitals is with adolescents.
In the last 23 years, since the first AIDS case was reported in 1986 estimates now indicate that the HIV sero-prevalence in Nigeria has increased by more than 3.0% to 5.0% in 2003, with much higher rates reported among high- risk groups. HIV and AIDS epidemic is poised to expand rapidly with women more vulnerable than men, while young women between 15-24 years are the most vulnerable group. The bulk of HIV infections in Nigeria are primarily transmitted through heterosexual sex. Several social, economic, and cultural factors contribute to the spread of HIV and AIDS in Nigeria. Some of these socio-cultural norms and values around sex, sexuality and gender relations. Most communities define a set of ideals that drive norms, through unwritten policies. In most instances, these “policies” are very powerful in shaping the sexual and health seeking behavior or lack of it among the community members.
Other determinants driving the epidemic are poverty, livelihood choices, inadequate access to quality prevention information, skills and care products /services and finally the failure of Nigeria’s leadership (though with few exceptions,) to recognize the seriousness of adolescent sexual reproductive health problem and make it a priority issues, it needs to be in terms of attention and investment.
POLITICAL CONTEXT
Nigeria operates a federal system of government modeled more after American model. The federal government is responsible for giving overall policy direction in key sectors including SRH, HIV and AIDS. They are expected to do this with the active participation of the state. Nigeria has 36 autonomous states that are technically responsible for conceptualizing the policy direction of sectors like SRH and HIV and AIDS thematic areas in their states. In an ideal setting, this conceptualization should be fed upfront into the federal government such that the final product reflects the heterogeneity of the 36 states. Evidence however suggests that this has been a challenge. The approach tends to be one forcing the conceptualization after the policy has been agree and signed off at the centre. This is one of the critical bottlenecks why ASRH are poorly implemented at state levels. The political arena is further complicated in that the Nigeria constitution recognizes 774 local government units. There is ongoing debate on whether local government is a constituent part of the state or whether it represents a 3rd tier of government. As presently constituted they are semi-independent elected structures like the states; they also agree their priorities and state; they also agree their priorities and invest in them, as they deem appropriate. This has a major implication in the efficiency of policy formulation and implication process.
LEADERSHIP & ASRH ISSUES
Despite Nigeria are signatories to different declarations such as UNESCO which states that states should allocate 26% to education, MDG’6 states that state should combat hiv, even the declaration done in the land of the self acclaim giant of Africa; the Abuja + 5 which states that African states should allocate 15% of the national budgetary allocation to health, Nigeria has never allocated up to 10%, though other states are counting down to 2001 UNGASS declaration to universal access to prevention, treatment care and support we are not exceptional to evaluate areas our leaders has done excellently well and were needs improvement A key area where leadership has not been displayed at all is in verbal commitment. Most leaders shy away from talking openly about the root cause of ASRH problem and behavior modification needed to scale down infection rates. There are little resources allocated to ASRH at all levels, especially at state and local government levels. There is a lack of distinct ASRH lines in their appropriation budget, and in general, the state & local government depend on donor funding for most of their activities in the ASRH sector. This is responsible for the slow build up of the response all over the country. Experience of some NGO’s working with government as partners indicates that even where fund is budgeted by government for ASRH bureaucratic process makes the actually allocated fund very difficult to be release.
ECONOMIC CONTEXT
Nigeria presents a paradox in terms of poverty; it is an oil producing country that is wealthy in human and natural capital, but is widely agreed that the incidence of multiple forms of poverty and deprivation are high. Nigeria is the 8th largest oil producing country in the world. The Nigerian economy lacks diversification and is dependent on the export of oil and other raw materials whose prices are low and determined from outside. The most commonly quoted statistics suggests that there has been a rising proportion of the population living below the poverty line. In addition, income inequality has increased. Nigeria is among the 20 countries in the world with the widest gap between the rich and poor.
It is a worldwide phenomenon and particularly so in most of the third world countries that women constitute the larger percentage of poor people, they however remain seriously disadvantaged in terms of access health, education, financial and agricultural extension services owing to legal, use of regulatory, cultural and structural barriers. Gender inequity in access to resources contributes to the rising problem of commercial sex work in the country. Studies done in Nigeria indicate that FSW are in the trade mainly because of poverty; requiring income to meet basic needs. This is compounded by the fact that many also lack needed skills to find alternative employment.
National Response to OVC Programme
The Federal Government has demonstrated its commitment through the inauguration of the OVC National Steering Committee, National Stakeholders’ Forum and National Technical Coordination Group. OVC Coordination Units was also established at Federal and State Ministries of Women Affairs. The OVC National Plan of Action, 2006 – 2010, received the personal approval of the former President’s (His Excellency, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo), the approval of the Federal Executive Council and the National Council of State before it was launched. With financial support from the Round 5 of the Global Fund, advocacy tool kits have been developed and used in advocacy visits to states, capacity of CSOs have been built to respond to the psychosocial needs of OVC. Funds are being disbursed for educational and health needs of OVC through the state ministries of women affairs.
Currently, the response to the OVC crisis is mainly by CSOs, which is largely donor driven, and lacks effective coordination. The scale of the response is not commensurate with the magnitude of the situation. There is high political commitment at the national level, but this is yet to translate to other levels of governance with implementation lacking across board. There are challenges that must be addressed in order to accelerate the national response to the problem. These include the need for effective coordination at all levels, mobilization of resources, capacity building for public sector, CSOs, communities and families to deliver essential services.
1.3 Summary of the OVC National Plan of Action 2006 - 2010
The five-year costed National Plan of Action 2006-2010 addresses, in clear terms, the survival, protection, participatory, developmental ,care and support needs of the most vulnerable children in Nigeria. It was developed through consultative and participatory approaches among all stakeholders, involving adults and children. The Plan adopts gender and rights-based approaches in the development of the framework that will accelerate and provide guidance for the national response on orphans and vulnerable children.
The Plan addresses the following key elements; protection, psychosocial care and support, education, health, household care and economic strengthening, advocacy and social mobilisation, legal and policy environment, children’s perspective, coordination structure monitoring, and evaluation. These are integral to the advancement of child’s rights and the achievement of the UNGASS, Millennium Development Goals and NEEDS. The NPA also sets out roles, responsibilities as well as legal and institutional framework for implementation which includes the strengthening of coordination, partnership and implementation structures. It defines program strategies which includes advocacy and social mobilization, scaling up the campaign on Children and AIDS, resource mobilization, engagement of civil society organizations, participatory rights of children and gender inequality and inequity.
Nigeria has the highest TB burden in Africa and is 4th among the 22 countries with high TB burden globally.
Nigeria has the highest TB burden in Africa and is 4th among the 22 countries with high TB burden globally. Estimated incidence for all cases is 311per 100,000 pop (460,000) and estimated incidence for smear positive (SM+) cases is 131 per 100,000 pop (195,000).
It has an estimated TB prevalence of 521/100,000 (772,000) and estimated Mortality rate of 93/100,000 (138,000). The estimated prevalence of MDR-TB among new TB cases is 1.8% and 9.4% among previously treated TB with a prevalence of HIV in adult TB patients (15-49yrs) 27%.
The Nigerian government formally launched its National TB and Leprosy Control
Programme (NTBLCP) in 1991 and adopted the World Health Organization (WHO)–recommended
DOTS strategy in 1993. Although detection of smear-positive TB cases has tripled
over the past eight years, the overall case detection rate of 27 percent is far short of the WHO target of 70 percent. And while the treatment success rate hovered between 71 and 74 percent from 1996 to 2002—slightly below the global target of 85 percent—the latest annual treatment success rate was only 59 percent.
The NTBLCP provides technical and strategic support for TB control activities to
Nigeria’s 36 autonomous states and this include effective and systematic data collection.
However, planning and implementation of TB services is largely decentralized to highly
autonomous State TB and Leprosy Control Officers (STBLCOs) and Regional National TB
Professional Officers. NTBLP efforts to raise awareness about TB and the requirements of the DOTS strategy and to increase political commitment to high-quality TB control programming must therefore focus on the state level as much as on the federal government.
Due to past patterns of donor involvement, states in the north still have far fewer
TB services than those in the south. Donors, the NTBLCP, and regional and state officials must devote particular attention to expanding TB control activities in the northern states. In addition, states must develop targeted services to address the higher concentrations of TB among vulnerable groups, including the urban poor, people living in remote areas, prisoners, migrant laborers, and people living with HIV.
The Priority Plan for OVC Programme in Nigeria
The Priority Plan (PP) was developed in line with the recommendations of the OVC National Technical Coordination Group (NTCG) after the launch of the OVC NPA in May 2007. This is to provide a platform for effective coordination and implementation of the NPA. The PP takes into account the National HIV AND AIDS Strategic Framework, 2005 – 2009.
All stakeholders are expected to support the implementation of the national response through their organizational plans focusing on the aim, objectives, and lines of action of the PP outlined below. Emphasis will also be placed on supporting the operationalisation of the three ones: National Strategic Framework, coordinating mechanism, monitoring and evaluation.
The magnitude and severity of the OVC crisis in Nigeria . Back to Destiny Resource Center (DRC)
The magnitude and severity of the OVC crisis in Nigeria is largely undetermined. It is evident that Nigeria is facing an OVC crisis with more than 7 million orphans due to AIDS and other causes, apart from millions of vulnerable children from several causes. There is a deepening and widening exclusion and invisibility of children in Nigeria. The information available paints a depressing picture of neglect, exploitation and abuse facing a large percentage of children today. It is estimated that 39% of children aged between 5 – 14 years are engaged in child labour; 43% of women aged 20 – 24 were married or in union before they were 18 years old between 1986 and 2004 (SWC, UNICEF 2006). A large proportion (40%) of street children may have been trafficked (ILO-IPEC 2001), estimated 40% do not attend primary school (NPC/ORC 2004) and the rights of most children in Nigeria are being denied.
HIV and AIDS became a national challenge over the past two decades when the first case was identified in a 13 year old street hawker. Since then, about one-quarter of the orphans populations in Nigeria are due to HIV and AIDS. The situation of children is further compounded by the worsening vulnerability of children through high maternal mortality, poverty, diseases, armed conflicts, socio-political and ecological problems, and communal clashes leading to family dislocation and instability in family income.
Violence towards women and children in Nigeria are of frightening proportions as it remains relatively unchallenged by government, civil society and families. Sexual abuse, of the increasing number of very young girls now working on the streets, has been well documented demonstrating clear linkages to exposure to HIV and AIDS. On the other hand the incidence of sexual abuse occurring within households remains a taboo subject with only anecdotal evidence and frequency of reporting in daily newspapers. Whilst children have always worked in Nigeria, increasing and deepening poverty and HIV and AIDS are driving millions of children into types of labour that are exploitative and hazardous. Increasingly, rural to urban migration has led to a weakened family safety net and reduced communal sense of responsibility for children.
The definition of OVC varies from society to society; therefore definitions are likely to be community specific. In times of OVC assessment for eligibility, children who require care and support will often be identified through household surveys in communities, and/or via self or community based- referral, referral from mobile HCT services, ART sites, PMTCT sites, support groups of PLWHAs, schools, FBOs, orphanages/children’s homes, the street ( street children), or prisons ( for children born to convicted mothers). All such children need to be assessed based on the community definitions of vulnerability; it will help in designing good intervention for children and their households.
It is widely recognized that children have increased resilience to be able to bear shock and hardship when they are surrounded by people who love, care and protect them. The sense of belonging children achieve through such relationships and the hope for a positive future that is nurtured enables them to cope with suffering. Psychosocial wellbeing refers to the love and affection caregivers provide on a daily basis. Psychosocial support and programmes are only needed for a very small number of children for whom the family care is not being provided or is not suffering to help them cope with the stress or trauma. Children have feelings about their parents becoming ill and eventually dying. This feeling of sadness and in most case fear are carried into adulthood by some of them unless such children are supported to express them and taught how to deal with them positively.
Programmes need to recognize the importance of supporting caregivers and relatives to provide a stable and protective environment which will in turn increase children’s capacity to cope with stressful situations and shocks. Girls and boys, men and women should be supported to come together to identify the risks of abuse and exploitation facing children in their communities and develop strategies to reduce these harms. The capacity of communities, particularly youths and children, to monitor the protection needs of children and families should be developed.
Poverty, attitude of parents and caregivers to the value of education; discrimination on the basis of sex, ethnicity, disability, and family economic status are all factors leading to lack of access to basic education in Nigeria. It is good to support communities and schools to manage holistic scholarship scheme for orphans and vulnerable children to take care of their education needs from pre-primary through vocational education. Empower parents/caregivers economically through IGA and micro-credit to be able to support orphans and vulnerable children to access basis education.
Poverty and vulnerability among households is some of the most critical upshots of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa. As the economically active people in the household come down with the infection or die eventually, families struggle to cope not just emotionally, but also economically. Facilitating the formation of OVC households corporative groups for the purpose of undertaking economic activities and accessing micro-finance will help them cope with challenges ahead while caring for the OVC.
Issues affecting children in general, aside from education, are not currently prioritized by government or donors. Therefore it is not surprising that awareness of issues affecting OVC is low. These can be address if the capacity of police, social welfare and health professionals’ to be able to respond sensively and in the best interest of the child to incidence of abuse. There is a need to work with children to clearly articulate the issues affecting their rights to protection, care and support to policy and decision makers at the community level.
Improvement in the conditions of all vulnerable groups, a large segment made up of caregivers, have significant implications on the welfare and rights of orphans and vulnerable children. When these goals, are met, orphans and vulnerable children will come into the enjoyment of their rights to survival, protection, care and support.
Local government authorities have the responsibility to incorporate concerns relevant to the safety, well-being and the fulfillment of the rights of OVC in LGA work plans and budgets. There is the need to build the capacity of the welfare departments of LGAs, LACAs, CBOs,FBOs and NGOs at the LGA to ensure proper coordination, data on OVC and their circumstances are collected, collated and disseminated for improve targeting and service delivery.
Without taking determined steps to address the specific needs of children, there will be no chance of meeting the MDGs and SEEDS. Each of the MDGs is connected to the well-being of children. Failure to achieve these goals would have devastating consequences for the children of this generation and the adults they will become if they survive their childhood.
HIV/AIDS FUND IS CORRUPT, TB NOT GIVING ADEQUATE ATTENTION IN NIGERIA, MDG 5&6 UNACHIEVABLE
It is good to use this opportunity to appreciate the effort of both the federal, states and local governments for creating an enabling environment for HIV/AIDS since 1999 under the leadership of Chief Olusegun Obasonjo. Let me thank the donor organizations and development partners that deem it fit to support the Nigerian Government on what is supposed to be their sole responsibilities.
Government are supposed to be guardian to the well being of people in the society, Government has to do with the process of being in control, command, regulation, bureaucracy, direction, equity, dominion, polity, ascendancy, supervision, administration, a social contract between the people and those in positions of trust.
75% of HIV/AIDS services in Nigerian is donor driven, I wonder what will happen to PLWHA already on drugs in the next 2 years (some partners are already threatening to pull our their services), some have reduce the number of enrollment on daily basis. The personnel’s employed by these partners will also go at the end of the life time, what happen to the big gap created in times of man power. By September this year, I will be 5 years on uninterrupted ARVs treatment. I was on PEPFAR enrollment register between 2005 to 2006, I later get a transfer later to ICAP supported facility in Kaduna state. This is a clear indication of being on donors support grogram for good five years. What determines my faith in the next 2 years, with the current threats of pulling out of services by most of these partners, what is my country doing to take over from the this partners, can I afford buying this dugs in the open market? Or I should be ready to faced drug resistance and die simple because my government can not afford their sole responsibilities.
NO ADEQUATE ATTENTION FOR TB CONTROL IN NIGERIA
HIV/AIDS is fueling a resurgence of TB in many areas of the world. Global incidence of TB has increased over the past 10 years, killing approximately 2 million people annually. At the same time, TB is a leading cause of death by infectious disease for people living with HIV/AIDS. Yet when contrasted with the extent of social mobilization around HIV/AIDS, the lack of political commitment to TB control is striking. The TB intervention in Nigeria is almost 80% donor driven since inception (government both at federal and states are not committed financially and some of the partners are threatening to pull out), what happen to thousands of people under Directly Observe Treatment Short cause DOTS?.
The federal government formally launched the National TB and Leprosy Control Programme (NTBLCP) in 1991 and adopted the WHO-recommended DOTS strategy in 1993. President Olusegun Obasonjo has demonstrated his political commitment to TB control through his active participation in high-level meetings of the Stop-TB Partnership, the African Heads of State, African Union and World Economic Forum. Including the Abuja declaration, yet public rhetoric has not been translated into funding allocations, either in the federal budget or at the state level (the national assembly approved over 2 billion for HIV/AIDS in 2010 budget and noting was approved for TB intervention).
Nigeria particularly has been one of the countries worst-affected by the TB and HIV epidemic. In the past 15-18 years, the incidence of Tuberculosis (TB) in Nigeria has silently, but steadily increased, posing a huge challenge to public health. Nigeria currently ranks 4th among countries with the highest TB burdens in the world.
Though, a curable disease, TB has now become a leading cause of death in many developing countries, including Nigeria, with statistics growing continually as a result of the huge HIV burden borne by the African continent.
Nigeria also bears a huge TB and HIV burden. Unfortunately when compared to HIV, awareness about TB among the general population is extremely poor. Despite the existence of a free TB treatment programme, information about how TB is spread, signs and symptoms and where to access TB treatment services is still lacking.
There is low political commitment to TB in contrast to what obtain in HIV/AIDS Programmes. Lack of civil society involvement in TB and interaction between TB and HIV among policy makers, care providers and people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). It is my prayer that the current AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (ATM) project on Community System Strengthening under the GFATM will enable the civil society provide effective and comprehensive services that will help Holt TB in our communities, since they are very closer to the community members.
Other factors include the high level stigma surrounding TB, Insufficient Government Funding for TB programmes compared to HIV and Death of health care workers. Nigeria, budgeted over 2 billion in its 2010 appropriation budget and no single kobo was budgeted for TB control, including states and local government which serves as the entering point for health care delivery.
The previous budget on health in the country is nothing to even talk about, 75% of health budget has been on capital expenditures, staff salaries and allowances, how can the remaining 25% cover 150 million Nigerians as service delivery (the entire budget on health, if divided by our population, every citizen is entitled for only N 750.00). If you take out the capital expenditures, salaries and allowances, what is left is 0 percent compare to the Nigerian population.
Though, Hon. Minister of Health, Federal Republic of Nigeria, promised to use the gaps identified in the 2010 Joint International Monitoring Mission (JIMM) on DOTS, TB/HIV to Nigerian report. The Minister who was ably represented by the Permanent Secretary, promised to develop subsequent plans using the 2010 JIMM report. The problem lies with the national assembly, is the issue of health really their concerns? If yes, I see no reason why the health budget can even be tempered with. Instead, they should look at how to ensure that the percentage on service delivery to the people is reasonable. This is the major and important dividend of democracy if properly demonstrated.
Unless our government at all level began to see these as a big threat towards achieving the MDGs 5 and 6 and also remit their promise on 15% annual budget to health, we are in great danger.
Most of the population remains underserved by TB diagnostic and treatment services.
Even within the states and local governments, clients have been reported to travel a distance of about 40 kilometers every day to receive treatment, which may be a contributing factor to relatively high rates of default on treatment. Patient-centered and community-based approaches modeled after support programs for people living with HIV/AIDS represent a promising model for achieving better DOTS coverage in a country as vast as Nigeria, though implementation will have to be adapted to different regional contexts. In addition, expanded partnerships with NGOs and volunteer programs could bring TB services closer to patients’ homes and help address the
Shortage of trained TB workers.
There is the need to bring the CSOs, the media, and community members on board for increase advocacy efforts for the prevention, early diagnosis and treatment of TB in Nigeria, as well as the need to promote interventions to address the TB/HIV co-epidemic. The need to ensure that community TB care CTBC component of the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Program (NTBLCP) strategic plan is captured in the States specific TB plans placing the State Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Program (STBLCP) in the driving seat, include a budget for the CTBC that includes provision of monetary and non monetary incentives and ensure a standardized systematic approach based on the National CTBC model is adopted for scale up.
CHALLEGES FACED BY PERSONS LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS (PLWHA):
Stigma is frustrating access to TB treatment especially for people living
With HIV/AIDS and the hostile attitude of health care providers is responsible for this. Nobody would want to go to a place where he or she is likely going to be treated like an outcast. No matter how effective the treatment becomes, at the end of the day, you will simply avoid such places. If that is the only place where such treatment exists, so be it; some individuals would rather die than go there.
Although many HIV/AIDS support groups especially those based in urban centers generally provide information and promote discussion on the symptoms of TB along with information on other opportunistic infections, the general public and even members of these support groups often lack basic knowledge about TB such as the location of treatment centers and the linkage between HIV/AIDS and TB.
Lack of accurate information fuels TB-related stigma. Many people continue to harbor
Misconceptions about TB, including the idea that people with the disease have been “poisoned.”
ANTI-STIGMA BILL, YET TO PASS IN TO LAW: NACA & Ministry of Labour need to sensitize other government agencies, including the national assembly that turned a deft ears to the Anti-stigma bill since inception of politics(In the country only Enugu state that has passed the bill into law), they have forgotten that, their brothers and sisters are also denied job opportunities or school admissions directly or indirectly as a result to not having a law that will protect the right of persons living with HIV/AIDS. The dismissal of the police recruits in Kaduna, Maiduguri, Sokoto, and Lagos over their HIV status in 2007, 10 days before passing out is a typical example and the more reason why NACA need and Labour need to sensitize other government agencies. Let them have copies of the National work place policy on HIV/AIDS, our intervention in 2007 during the sacking of police recruits revealed that, these agencies are not aware of the existence of such policy.
We the person living with HIV/AIDS also need to be up and doing. I see no reason why we should publicly say we want government to be feeding us, is the HIV more special than other sickness in the world, what about those with TB, Hepatitis, Diabetics’ etc, are they not also citizens of the this country. We should not become professional beggars, because we are productive, can work for 24 hours and still remain healthy. I urge my fellow brothers and sisters to be up and doing. We have those who are likely to become governors and presidents among us.
MY STATE, KADUNA IS NOT EXCEPTION OF THE ABOVE CHALLENGES
Let me acknowledge the effort of Kaduna State Government for the prompt release of HIV/AIDS counterpart funding. However, Kaduna state ranks the third list of high-burden TB state in Nigeria. There exist so many partners that provide TB/HIV care and support services in the state, but there is no proper way of coordinating the response of these partners. The partners only find their ways to provide TB/HIV services in their programs. There is no state owned program or facility that is implementing the collaborative TB/HIV services. The State TB and Leprosy Control program has not been funded by the state government for over two years now.
Kaduna state TBLCP in collaboration with some development partners established a TB/HIV partners forum with the aim to ensure integration of TB/HIV services at all levels, and coordinate the TB/HIV response but the forum could not succeed due to lack of funding.
TB has remained the major opportunistic infection that claims the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS on daily bases. The non total free treatment of TB in our facilities also contributed to non adherence thereby patients die on the process (Patients still pay for X-Ray at the rate of 800 to 1,000, unlike the treatment of HIV where patients are given full treatment/diagnoses e.g. CD4, Viral load, PVC etc free). In the case of TB, only the drugs and sputum smear test are free, only HIV patients have access to free diagnoses of TB, but generally people pay to access TB test.
Most of the TB/HIV services in the state and even Nigeria at large are donor driven. There is no adequate sustainability plans by the Government, the private sectors also did not find it interesting to support health related services, instead, they support activities such as entertainments and politics forgetting that TB/HIV is a major factor that if care is not taking, they are at risk of losing their well experience staffs and there will be no body to replace such people. They are also likely to lose a high number of customers/consumers, partners/collaborators, which reduces their production and income.
The civil society are either doing little or nothing about the fight against TB, their focus is on HIV/AIDS possibly because there is funding opportunities on HIV/AIDS programs.
Unless both the private and public sector invest largely to Stop TB/HIV in our society if not, our generation is likely to be wipe-out very soon (the current HIV trend in Kaduna state now is 7% based on the 2008 ANC survey as against 5.6% in 2005, most of which have TB related cases, some have died with TB related cases). We don’t need to leave our responsibilities to development partners alone, hence our country is richly blessed with so many resources and investors.
It is very unfortunate that, despite these challenges in Kaduna state, a huge amount of funds was returned to the World Bank due to in ability of the state in utilizing the funds, NGOs, CBOs, and FBOs were asked to apply for the said funds, huge amount of money was used for first review of proposals, validation of successful candidates and final selection process. It is obvious that, these funds were returned to the World Bank without awarding to the successful candidates. Since the last disbursement in 2006-2007, NGOs are not empowered to scale up activities at the community level.
HIV/AIDS prevalence still on the increase and reason yet unknown, hence stakeholders are not brought together to find out the reason. Activities are not well coordinated, every body seems to be doing what he/she likes in the state, no proper way of reporting to the state, thereby rendering the state vulnerable with under reporting donors, partners, NGOs, CBOs, and FBOs activities.
What is you and I, doing to address the above challenges.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)